![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Once(!) is right.
Will your insurance company buy you a replacement SR-22 after you pop = that chute? Especially if you had to use it because of ice? ---JRC--- "Dan Thompson" wrote in message = gy.com... The nice thing about a Cirrus is also you could always (i.e., once) = pop the chute if the TKS couldn't keep up. I would think this would be = comforting when choosing to fly through a what was believed to be little known = ice that the TKS system should be able to easily handle, just in case you found = it is was more ice than anyone would have expected and you ran out of other options. I think the TKS/chute combo would allow a lot of flights = that would keep me on the ground otherwise. =20 "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "ET" wrote in message ... My father owns SR-22, it has an anti-icing system (sprays solution = out from micro holes in the wings/prop/etc)... I am not yet a pilot, so I'm certain I don't understand all the complexities of this, but would an = SR-22 with this system still be as limited as your statement suggests?? Even when certified for flight into known icing, light planes are = simply no match for real icing conditions. Anti-ice or de-ice equipment is = useful for buying yourself more time in which to leave the icing conditions = (climb, descend, turn around) but they don't come close to matching the all-weather capabilities of airliners. Heck, even the smaller airliners (turboprops) can easily get out of = their depth. The installation on your father's SR-22 is simply an escape route. = It doesn't provide him with anything near all-weather capabilities with respect to icing. Pete =20 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|