![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "private" wrote in message news:U2XVe.197819$Hk.65205@pd7tw1no... "Icebound" wrote in message .. . snip Because I have tried to find a similar tailwheel rule in the official Canadian rules, and have been unable to do so. AFAIK there is no tailwheel endorsement required by CARs in Canada. After the issue came up, I have been searching through the regs at length and have come to this same conclusion. ....snip CARS... IMHO it could be argued (by TC) that stopping is an act that immediately follows the coming into contact with a supporting surface and that stopping is a part of a landing. Do you want to hire a lawyer to argue that a stop is not a part of a landing? Lawyers love unclear regulations, which is why they write so many of them. I cannot cite legal opinion or case law. IMHO making 5 full stop landings each 6 months is the prudent action before carrying passengers. IMHO tailwheel is not a separate class and the required 5 landings can be in a tricycle gear or TW and would apply to skis but not floats. I do not know what would be required for ampibious floats but would guess that 5 land + 5 water would be required. IMHO any of these required TO&landings can be dual (with CFI) or solo. Having read and re-read that section, I would interpret it as per your HO *except* the part about counting dual. If the CFI is PIC, then I would interpret that you cannot. If *you* are PIC, then of course you can. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|