![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
*Does* everyone read it back? Many do, many don't... Going off topic for a personal rant: You still hear a lot of garbage on the air like: "Area traffic please advise" Which is an ego boost that really means: "I am too important to listen to your transmissions, now YOU listen up because - I - am more important than you are, and - I - want you to tell me where you are and what you are doing, as - I - was doing other things and not listening to you when you made your previous courtesy call". Here is the briefing from Jer/: "Don't buy ENRON... read the AIM, and LEARN how to talk on the radio"!!!! Well, they ASKED for advice, didn't they? They got as much advice as their CRAP transmission was worth to me!!!! Think about it... what is the difference between "Podunk traffic" and "Podunk AREA traffic"... other than the waste of air time and ego on the frequency. Do you really think that YOU, a PILOT, need to be INVITED to talk on the radio by someone who's ego is much bigger than yours, and who doesn't have the courtesy to listen to your transmissions, nor the training (or reading from the AIM) about what to say on the radio? "Standard is better than 'better'... if what you are doing is SO MUCH BETTER THAN STANDARD, go through channels and see that it is adopted as the standard. Until then, standard is better than standard". The AIM and the FAA Advisory Circulars are the standard! Back on topic NOT reading back ident or squawk codes: This VERY topic came up with both a DEN Center controller and a DEN Class B approach controller presenting at our Civil Air Patrol squadron meeting. Both IMMEDIATELY said "your squawk is your response, however, if you are confused about the code, or the frequency is VERY quiet, read it back". BOTH wanted only the squawk to change, or the IDENT to happen as the ONLY response. Their point is... this is not an immediacy issue. They will see the response in a timely manner... and they have other things to do on other frequencies, or on the data strips, or are on the phone. Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocation!" Eberhard -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer'at'frii.com WEB http://users.frii.com/jer/ C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider, FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot, BM218 HAM N0FZD, 233 Young Eagles! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________---_ unakm | Karl Treier | Aviation Marketplace | 3 | December 17th 04 11:37 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ gitqexec | OtisWinslow | Products | 7 | November 12th 04 06:34 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! _____________ efamf | Keith Willshaw | Naval Aviation | 4 | November 11th 04 01:51 AM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ gitqexec | Richard Hertz | Products | 0 | November 7th 04 11:45 PM |
More on transponder petition | Ian Cant | Soaring | 1 | February 27th 04 06:37 PM |