![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Garner Miller wrote:
In article , Bob Gardner wrote: According to the Pilot/Controller Glossary, you were right and the controller was wrong. You might want to talk to a quality control person at OSU. How do you figure? From the P/CG: "OPTION APPROACH- An approach requested and conducted by a pilot which will result in either a touch-and-go, missed approach, low approach, stop- and-go, or full stop landing." Says the same thing the AIM says. A back-taxi is not on the above list. The OP said he "requested a back taxi", it didn't say he just did it without asking. Prior to requesting the back taxi, he said he landed and stopped on the runway. That clearly IS permitted by the "option" landing clearance. I say he did nothing wrong and the controller doesn't understand what "cleared for the option" means. Now, the controller certainly wasn't obligated to approve a back-taxi, but the OP certainly did nothing wrong based on the description given. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Displaced AFSS "controllers" heading for BIL and GRB | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 10th 05 09:22 PM |
Aviation Conspiracy: FAA Calls Controller Whistleblowers "Rogue Employees!!! | Bill Mulcahy | General Aviation | 0 | March 31st 05 04:29 AM |
Third Military-Civil MAC Jan. 18, 2005 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 37 | February 14th 05 03:21 PM |
Flight Controllers | Howard Witzenburger | Simulators | 1 | September 24th 04 02:25 AM |
FS9 - force feedback & 2 controllers | JT | Simulators | 0 | October 22nd 03 02:24 PM |