![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
john smith writes:
Then we smelled it. A sharp electrical smell that told us something was burning and not quite right. Steve quickly turned off the misbehaving #2 radio. The smell got stronger, but there was no visible smoke. A moment later, when the realization hit home that we might have a serious problem, I keyed the mike to tell Atlanta Center that we smelled smoke, may have a developing issue with our #2 radio, [snip] Another case of the electronic device in the circuit path to protect the circuit breaker from overload. How true! :-) Now, if there are any EEs present, perhaps they can explain why aircraft radios tend to fail in this manner whereas nothing much of anything else in the electronic world fails in a manner to produce heat and smoke. Are avionics units designed so close to the components' limits to cause this failure mode? I can understand a transmitter going up in smoke (while transmitting), but a receiver? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GOLD RUSH PROGRAM | GOLD RUSH PROGRAM | Home Built | 1 | March 29th 05 09:33 PM |
Bill Cliton verses Rush Limbaugh | Transition Zone | Military Aviation | 14 | November 20th 03 05:13 PM |