![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/20/2005 12:45, xyzzy wrote:
wrote: As far as instrument training at night, there are good things and bad things. The only real bad thing is it may be more difficult to read charts and such over dim and/or colored cockpit lighting. If you're still still learning the intricacies of reading IFR charts and plates, that can add a bit of congestion to your already overloaded head. Yes, I started IFR training in the winter of last year and did a lot of basic manuevers and chartless approaches (talked through it by the instructor) at night. By the time I was doing aproaches and flying with charts, it was light at my usual training time. Now that it's gettting dark earlier, I'm surprised at how hard it is to put together two things I did well independently (maneuver at night under foggles + use charts). I too saw this the first time I did a cross county IFR training flight at night. I had to look at the chart and determine on which bearing I was from various VORs along the route. There is a larger work load when having to point a flashlight at the chart, then at the panel to scan the instruments, then back to the chart, etc. It would have been easier if my light had been brighter, but there's a cost associated with that (in reduced night adaptation). On the plus side, lots of the subtle visual cues that you get while wearing foggles aren't there. The small peripheral vision leaks out the side of the foggles, the sun changing angles on the instrument panels, etc.... those are pretty much gone at night. You'll have a more realistic environment to train for true "lack of outside references." I disagree with this. When at night under the foggles, when you fly over towns or cities, the glow from the ground is really noticeable in your peripherial vision. Because of this I feel like at night I'm actually getting more visual cues than I should when under the foggles. I agree with this as well. While training, I used to try to ignore all the visual cues (and was able to get disoriented from time to time) - flying at night didn't make this any easier... but I was flying over the valley between Oakland and Sacramento - not the darkest part of the planet to be sure. IMO the best VFR conditions for hood training are hazy southeastern afternoons. Of course, as others have said - nothing beats actual IMC for giving you respect for IMC ;-) If any pilot (or prospective pilot) hasn't experienced it yet, they should grab an instructor and go do it; regardless of their Instrument Rating aspirations. It will really open your eyes - Especially if you think "How hard can it be?" ;-) -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Student night solo? | Peter MacPherson | Piloting | 50 | November 10th 04 01:51 AM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
CFI logging instrument time | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | November 11th 03 12:23 AM |