![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:37BYe.16451$Zg5.9169@trndny05... Matt Barrow wrote: By that time, it's too late for that to do any good. Why? Let's say you got two job offers in 1984. One company offered you $30,000/year with a retirement package that would continue to pay you 1/3 my salary if you retire after 25 years. Another company offered you $32,000/year with no retirement package. Both companies are assumed to offer similar percentage raises as time goes on. You have a choice. Accept the higher paying job and save for retirement or take the lower paying job and go for the security. You take the security. First mistake (actually, first two mistakes). Twenty years later, your firm eliminates or heavily curtails the retirement package (whatever their legal situation allows them to do). It's too late to go back and get that higher salary that would have allowed you to build your own. That's part of the reason why #1 and #2 are mistakes. Here's one that bit me (kinda) back in 1998: You work for a company for seven years in which the company retirement plan is the company stock, (you can ALSO take an independent 401K on your own). You can opt out at any time, but you're not fully vested until your fifth anniversary. You can rejoin, but must wait another five years to opt out again. Company goes belly up, stock value goes from $105 to penny stocks in nine months time. Advantage #1: your wife, who works for one of the larger stock brokerage firms (Investment ANALYST, not a SPECULATOR), has you opt out of the stock plan after your five year anniversary and divest your portfolio (MSFT, WALMART, INTEL). You lose only two years of stock value, not seven. Advantage #2: Learning long before NEVER to trust all/most my funds in the hands of someone I have no control over. So many Americans "want their cake and to eat it, too"; it has a tendency to bite one on the rump...badly. I can see your scenario, but I also know that "security" is a chimera. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Inspiration by friends - mutal interest and motivation to get the PPL | Gary G | Piloting | 1 | October 29th 04 09:19 PM |
USAFM Friends Journal | EDR | Piloting | 0 | February 13th 04 02:19 PM |
Friends hold D.C. vigil for downed pilot | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 19th 04 01:58 AM |
OT - For my American Friends | funkraum | Military Aviation | 1 | June 30th 03 09:37 PM |