![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S Narayan wrote:
I don't see a big difference in the time taken from saying "Ready for takeoff" to saying "Holding for IFR release". I usually say "ready to go, IFR". I also mention that I'm IFR when I request my taxi instructions. I'd prefer an extra half-second of radio time to the possibility of confusion. KCDW modified their procedures a while back in a similar way. They no longer provide the squawk code with the clearance information; it's [almost] always "clearance on release". I asked once, and was told that there was a problem with people taking off IFR and the tower not realizing they were IFR. Holding back the squawk apparently blocks that. *Why* (or "how") this occurred is a part of the back story that - unfortunately - I was not told. I'm still curious, should anyone here know. - Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Los Angeles radio tower crash kills 2 | Paul Hirose | Piloting | 178 | August 6th 05 03:46 PM |
Tower Enroute Control? | Sam Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | June 2nd 04 02:31 AM |
New Oshkosh Tower | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 20 | November 25th 03 05:35 PM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Bruce E. Butts | Home Built | 4 | July 26th 03 11:34 AM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 0 | July 24th 03 04:15 AM |