![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Duniho wrote: "George Patterson" wrote in message news:mle_e.11361$L15.4226@trndny01... I agree that a computer can do a great job when everything goes more or less according to plan, but what about when it doesn't? Actually, a computer can do a great job of anything you can think of. It has a problem if something comes up that nobody thought of The real question is whether pilots on average are able to come up with inspired solutions to problems more often than they create problems with perfectly good airplanes. Looking at major air accidents in the US over the past 5 years I'd say humans are doing awfully well. Aside from the AA airbus right after 9/11 (which has lots of question marks) it's not at all clear to me that well trained pilots in modern airliners don't save more than they cause. A fairly large chunk of Part 121 accidents involve maintenance or systemic causes that a computer pilot would not presumably make any difference with. OTOH, fully-automated aircraft would probably make a huge difference for GA safety, where pilot failure is the primary cause of accidents. This is the same reason that autopilot cars are a good idea, no matter how offensive they may seem to some people. Yes, there will be failures of the equipment. But that will happen MUCH less often than the failures of the humans, and will improve the reliability and efficiency of our transportation infrastructure at the same time. Look at this for an idea of the state-of-the-art in robot cars. It's pretty pathetic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_DARPA_Grand_Challenge OTOH, ABS and stability control, etc. have unquestionabaly made driving much safer. Some high-end cars use forward-looking radar to sound an alarm if you start closing in on the car ahead of you very quickly and even cruise control which maintains a following distance rather than fixed speed. Presumably this trend will continue much as an Airbus today is a largely automated plane but with big decisions still made by pilots. -cwk. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is MDHI going to make it? | Matt Barrow | Rotorcraft | 55 | June 12th 05 05:04 PM |
Power Commercial to Glider Commercial | Mitty | Soaring | 24 | March 15th 05 03:41 PM |
Do You Want to Become a Commercial Helicopter Pilot? | Badwater Bill | Rotorcraft | 7 | August 22nd 04 12:00 AM |
What to study for commercial written exam? | Dave | Piloting | 0 | August 9th 04 03:56 PM |
Another Addition to the Rec.Aviation Rogue's Gallery! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 125 | February 1st 04 05:57 AM |