![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you are missing the point of my post; which
was that the emphasis should be on ensuring that pilots follow correct, basic routines such as DIs and preflight checks, rather than on teaching how to land without airbrakes. Prevent the cause. Maybe, obviously I don't know, but maybe there were supervisory issues that needed to be addressed. After all, a pilot managed to bring his glider to the launch point and be launched without any checks being done and his airbrakes taped shut. Nobody noticed the lack of airbrake checks prior to acceptance of the rope/cable, and nobody noticed the tape over the airbrakes. Teaching rope breaks and winch launch failures is normal enough and I would never suggest it is unnecessary. Teaching landings without use of airbrakes is unnecessary and possibly risky. Being able to competently side slip is worth mastering. Jump down off that high horse and stop over-reacting. First you wanted to blame this pilots problem on skimpy training. Now you want to blame it on the wing runner, tow pilot or anyone else who may have been in the area. Believe it or not, it is the sole responsibility of the PIC to assure that his glider is ready for flight. If you can't accept that then you should do us all a favor and take up bird watching. Next your attitude that no spoiler landings thru touchdown are risky, is probably more a reflection of your skills and or training, rather than a good basic understanding of the task. Although it may be that you just have a misunderstanding of the difference between a simulated spoiler failure and an actual spoiler failure. First let's assume you were smart enough to find a competent instructor who was proficient with this maneuver. If you have, then there will be no real risk (provided of course that you can either follow instructions or at least not fight him for the controls if you are just totally inept). The instructor's job is to assure that you don't touch down with any significant yaw and that you abort the task and use spoilers if your using up an excessive amount of runway. Maybe you could explain what sounds so risky about this? For the other poster who implies that it is madness, and of course it can't be done in an open class ship. We train with ASK-21's and G-103's, both of which will touch down and stop in about 1400 ft without any wheel brake. In case you don't understand why no brake, in an ASK or Grobe the wheel brake is on the spoiler handle, so no spoiler no wheel brake. And yes I have routinely landed a Janus and a Duo Discus without spoilers. You might be surprised to know that they will stop quicker than the K-21, because the wheel brake is not on the spoiler handle. The real madness in our sport is our accident rate. There should be little argument that this is a direct reflection of the minimal skills most pilots accept as adequate. So keep up the standards by finding some good old boy to do your next BFR with. And don't forget to remind him that a 1 hour soaring flight and normal landing will be fine with you. M Eiler |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 09:14 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |