![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I should elaborate a little more. A little research indicates that
there are many problems with ethanol. RST Engineering wrote: Ethanol should not be approved for use in general aviation aircraft. It seems like a great idea, but the ethanol is highly caustic The hell you say. Your source? And to WHAT is it caustic? To fuming red nitric acid, WATER is caustic. and eats hoses Hasn't eaten a single hose on my Miata and it has been running on the stuff for ten years. Rubber hoses in recent models of cars have been made more resistant to ethanol. The vast majority of airplanes, however, were built before 1987. and corrodes carburetors How? The chemical reaction between ethanol and steel/aluminum appears to be benign. Again, your source other than OWT? The chemical reaction between ethanol and steel/aluminum is not benign. I was able to turn up several papers documenting that ethanol was corrosive to aluminum, at the very lest. It also corrodes fuel injectors. and cylinders. Seems that the entire US auto fleet would be in serious doo doo if this were true. It ain't. Oh, but it is true. You may be a little young to remember, but back in the days when ethanol was first introduced, the entire US auto fleet was in very serious doo doo. Mechanics all over the country were kept busy cleaning and repairing engines and fuel system components damaged by ethanol. No part of the fuel system was immune, from the gas tank to the exhaust system. Of course, this was all before the Internet existed, so if all you know is what you learn from the Internet, you are probably totally ignorant of that bit of history. An airplane is not an automobile. Over time automobiles have been redesigned to be more tolerant of ethanol, whereas airplanes have not. A somewhat shorter engine life may be acceptable to an automobile owner. It is not to an airplane owner. Ethanol is also more expensive than gasoline. Not the argument. Keep OT please. Well, that was random. What are you, an ethanol salesman? You are going to have to come up with a better argument than just telling me to shut up. Ethanol is more expensive than gasoline. It also reduces gas mileage. I suggest that those things are important to pilots. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ethanol Powered Airplane Certified In Brazil | Victor | Owning | 4 | March 30th 05 09:10 PM |
Sugar-powered plane unveiled | Mal | Soaring | 12 | October 26th 04 07:49 AM |
Local Amoco now blending ethanol | Ben Smith | Owning | 5 | April 1st 04 04:37 PM |