![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mike Beede wrote: In article , John Bell wrote: Bad idea. Probably 90% of the time it is O.K., but the other 10% is reason not to. However, I read somewhere that the controller must specifically mention if they intend to vector you across the localizer. I conclude this is either incorrect or widely ignored, because the times I've been vectored through the localizer, no one said anything. I haven't noticed a lot of radio traffic, either, but they might be talking on another frequency.... Can one of our ATC folks comment on my ill-remembered "fact?" Mike Beede The controller is indeed supposed to tell you if he's planning to vector you through the localizer. As you've noticed, it's often not done. This relatively minor transgression on the controller's part, however, does not justify your deciding to turn to intercept the localizer without a clearance. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aeronautical Engineering Help needed | Marc A. Lefebvre US-775 | Home Built | 94 | January 11th 04 12:33 PM |
ILS Critical Area signage: Localizer or Glideslope? | Adam K. | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 30th 03 10:09 PM |
Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 04:36 PM |
Localizer Back Course vs. ILS | ilsub | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 25th 03 04:04 PM |