![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can recall someone on this group once suggesting that if
you're past the localizer and concerned that you may be getting close to terrain, and the frequency is too busy to get a word in, that hitting IDENT is likely to cause ATC to notice. This seems like a bit of an aggressive solution, but I'd guess the controllers would prefer it to someone breaking off from their assigned heading or altitude because of worries about terrain avoidance. Could any of the controllers comment on this? -- David Rind |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aeronautical Engineering Help needed | Marc A. Lefebvre US-775 | Home Built | 94 | January 11th 04 12:33 PM |
ILS Critical Area signage: Localizer or Glideslope? | Adam K. | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 30th 03 10:09 PM |
Established on the approach - Checkride question | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 59 | October 6th 03 04:36 PM |
Localizer Back Course vs. ILS | ilsub | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 25th 03 04:04 PM |