|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
October 6th 05, 08:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg Farris" wrote in message
... In article . net, says... Because the navaid is not on the extended runway centerline. Nope - Look at the VOR 14 approach to ITH (Ithaca New York - Just grabbed the book and picked that one by chance). The VOR is on the centerline, the runwya heading is 144.6° and the VOR approach is 133°. When you break out, you have to turn 11.6° right to land. I don't see why they couldn't have published it right on the 145° radial. GF Because if they had you flying the 145 radial, you'd be flying parallel to the extended centerline of runway 14 and would still have to sidestep to be aligned. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPS/WAAS VNAV approaches and runway length | Nathan Young | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | October 25th 04 06:16 PM |
| Closest SDF, LDA and LOC-BC Approaches | Andrew Sarangan | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | June 5th 04 03:06 PM |
| The new Instrument Rating PTS | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 7 | May 27th 04 12:35 AM |
| FS2004 approaches, ATC etc | henri Arsenault | Simulators | 14 | September 27th 03 12:48 PM |
| Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |
Threaded Mode