![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Garret" wrote in message ... Ah, so you have. You said you'd go straight in. So my followup question (if you'll indulge me) is: do you acknowledge that this would be a technical violation of the FARS? (You'd have to start descending below the MEA on V21 before passing an IAF for the approach.) I wouldn't have to stay on V21, I could move over two degrees to the 200 radial used for the approach. As for a possible technical violation of the FARs, I've had a complete communications failure for unknown reasons, and while my navigational radios are functioning, I'm not sure how long they will continue to do so. To avoid a possible loss of navigational capability in IMC I'm using the emergency authority granted me by FAR 91.3 to deviate from any rule of Part 91. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
Required hold? | Nicholas Kliewer | Instrument Flight Rules | 22 | November 14th 04 01:38 AM |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IFR in the 1930's | Rich S. | Home Built | 43 | September 21st 03 01:03 AM |