![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any company that truly acts as if the customer is always right is in for a
relatively short existence. A company exists to make money - the products and services are vehicles. In this case my standard comment to people who protest loudly about not getting something for free is simple. Meet me half way and become a customer. Customers are the very small subset of people who are profitable for me to make happy. Very happy. We have customers who have stayed with us for over ten years. (in IT that is pretty good) We also started making ends meet when we fired the uneconomical customers. Customers actually pay me for stuff. Hell if all the prospects and abusers were all right I would be begging on street corners... It is the vendor's prerogative to decide who he or she will sell to. In this case - given the limited market, and potential costs I would certainly be cautious about "tyre kickers". So - Yes the desirable customer is always right, and small businesses have a duty to be careful about deciding who those desirable customers are. Stanford Korwin wrote: If You have to be kidding. Whatever happened to 'the customer is always right'. If these people want our money they have to get real and realise that they have to earn it. We are talking about the same people who made the Puchaz after all, large credibility gap there I would think. No Don, the customer is not always right - he is very often very wrong - and, in any event, he has to qualify as a genuine, twenty four carat, customer. Equally, we are not talking about about the same people who made the Puchacz - or any known credibility gap - at least known to me. I have to say that, having traded with Poland until fairly recently, and knowing Mr. Beres, the designer and manufacturer of the Diana, I am not prepared to accept Mr. Sharma's version of events and I strongly suspect that BB was absolutely correct. I have never heard of Mr. Sharma before, I cannot understand why he should have been invited to test fly this sailplane - except at his own request - I find his whole attitude questionable and I rather suspect that Bogumil Beres sensed that all was not as it seemed and decided not to take any chances. Good for him - I would have done exactly the same. sta13. -- Bruce Greeff Std Cirrus #57 I'm no-T at the address above. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |