A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Debacle: Flight test of Diana-2



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21  
Old October 15th 05, 08:20 PM
Bruce
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flight test of Diana-2

Any company that truly acts as if the customer is always right is in for a
relatively short existence.

A company exists to make money - the products and services are vehicles.

In this case my standard comment to people who protest loudly about not getting
something for free is simple. Meet me half way and become a customer. Customers
are the very small subset of people who are profitable for me to make happy.
Very happy. We have customers who have stayed with us for over ten years. (in IT
that is pretty good) We also started making ends meet when we fired the
uneconomical customers. Customers actually pay me for stuff. Hell if all the
prospects and abusers were all right I would be begging on street corners...

It is the vendor's prerogative to decide who he or she will sell to. In this
case - given the limited market, and potential costs I would certainly be
cautious about "tyre kickers".

So - Yes the desirable customer is always right, and small businesses have a
duty to be careful about deciding who those desirable customers are.

Stanford Korwin wrote:
If You have to be kidding. Whatever happened to 'the

customer
is always right'. If these people want our money they
have to get real and realise that they have to earn
it. We are talking about the same people who made the
Puchaz after all, large credibility gap there I would
think.




No Don, the customer is not always right - he is very
often very wrong - and, in any event, he has to qualify
as a genuine, twenty four carat, customer.

Equally, we are not talking about about the same people
who made the Puchacz - or any known credibility gap
- at least known to me.

I have to say that, having traded with Poland until
fairly recently, and knowing Mr. Beres, the designer
and manufacturer of the Diana, I am not prepared to
accept Mr. Sharma's version of events and I strongly
suspect that BB was absolutely correct.

I have never heard of Mr. Sharma before, I cannot understand
why he should have been invited to test fly this sailplane
- except at his own request - I find his whole attitude
questionable and I rather suspect that Bogumil Beres
sensed that all was not as it seemed and decided not
to take any chances.

Good for him - I would have done exactly the same.

sta13.






















--
Bruce Greeff
Std Cirrus #57
I'm no-T at the address above.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots paul k. sanchez Piloting 19 September 27th 04 11:49 PM
PC flight simulators Bjørnar Bolsøy Military Aviation 178 December 14th 03 12:14 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.