![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Personally I think you are burying the hatchet deeply
for personal reasons, and I really believe you had no intention to buy this ship. That said, lets look at your list. Many of your suggestions are just common sense stuff, but many are tainted with your personal feelings. Item 2 is subjective at best. You may FEEL that all controls should be of the auto-hookup type, but that is not a certification requirement. Your opinion here is irrelevant........ Item 4 is subjective at best. The aircraft meets JAR 22. Item 5 is conjecture on your part. You are presupposng a failure mode not in evidence by inferring that it is problematic. Item 8 is patently incorrect. Carbon structures do not "store energy". Your description of the failure mode shows a lack of understanding of composite structures. Item 13 is again subjective. Properly assembled trailing edges do not delaminate regardless of their construction method. Your presupposition that fabric wrapped edges are superior is not based in fact, just an opinion you hold. Attempting to show one Trailing Edge construction method as superior to another again shows the limitations of your composite construction background. Item 15 is pure conjecture. You are asking that a JAR 22 aircraft manufacturer test for a condition that occurs only when a pilot makes an error and flys the aircraft incorrectly. IF this test was required, the conservative folks adninistering JAR 22 would see that it was added to the cert plan. YOU appear to be afraid of the small crosssection of the tail boom and seem to be inventing a reason to make it appear less than desirable. Item 17 is a prudent thought, but horribly skewed your personal perspective. You said the paint is too thin. Compared to what?? Is that viewpoint based on cosmetics or a by a MIL thickness check against the manufacturers recommended film thicknesses? I suspect you have no idea how much or little paint is needed for UV protection and what the finish requirements are.. Absent the specific resin used and the finish content, you are in no position to comment on UV protection issues. Yes you may FEEL the finish was "very thin", but in fact, that is your PERCEPTION, not a fact per se. I would hope that you would try to post facts on your site instead of opinions. It would be a nice change......... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |