A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Power setting table and best economy/best power...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21  
Old October 19th 05, 01:32 PM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Power setting table and best economy/best power...

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:31:26 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

"Friedrich Ostertag" wrote in message
...
On a turbocharged engine egt affects the enthalpy delivered to the
turbocharger turbine and in turn the power deliverd to the compressor.
This will result in a slight change in boost pressure and therefore MP for
a given throttle setting.

Whether this will be a big enough change to be noticed under typical
operating conditions of an airplane engine I don't know.


Thank you for trying to save me. However, I have to admit a couple of
things: I wasn't meaning to restrict my (erroneous) comments to turbocharged
engines; and your point, while an interesting take on the question, is
probably only valid for turbocharged engines with manual wastegates.

Of course, that second point requires qualification too: I have noticed in
my own airplane (turbocharged engine, with an automatic wastegate) that at
high altitudes, above the critical altitude for the turbo, RPM becomes the
primary power control. It's as if at lower RPM, there just isn't enough
energy in the exhaust to keep the turbo working effectively. Throttle at
full, then adjust RPM. Small adjustments to RPM can make significant (1" or
more) changes in MP.

The RPM thing isn't really what you were talking about, but it seems related
in context.

Anyway, thanks for posting more to think about.

Pete


I notice that on my turbo-normalized, manually waste-gated engine, too. As
a matter of fact, if I'm climbing into the low teens, and maintaining say
25/2500 during the climb, at my target altitude, decreasing RPM to 2400 RPM
will usually drop my MP by 2-3" or so.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.