![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Moore" wrote in message . 122... "Dudley Henriques" wrote AOA is optional equipment for GA and I understand the airlines have done a study on it's use in large aircraft. Most of us joining PanAm during, or just after Vietnam, had considerable experience flying AOA and couldn't understand why the latest jetliners were not so equipped. It soon became obvious that ALPA and the old WWII bomber captains that it represented wanted nothing to do with modern technology. This group rejected CVRs, GPWS, AOA and anything else that would have required them to be retrained. This group of pilots are held in high esteem by almost everyone except those of us who had to fly with them. They had received minimal training for their B-17 or C-47 job in the Airforce and only through the strength of the union, barely made it through the jet transition. They still (1960's) would fly a "raw data" ILS instead of using the flight director. Most of them had no business in a jet airplane. PanAm crashed a large number of their B-707s due to pilot issues. Bob Moore That's interesting. I know it's hard sometimes to wean pilots off those steam gauges and into new technology. What was it one guy said the first time he used an MFD? "Now I know how my dog feels watching TV" :-) On raw data and the FD; It would seem prudent to me to have the guy flying the approach on the FD with the other seat monitoring the raw data. I know the one time I landed a DC8, (just a guest of the chief pilot of the airline on a ferry flight into Alaska ) this was the procedure we used. My understanding on AOA for you heavy drivers is that you actually have preferred using a calculated approach speed for the GW rather than AOA because the configurations and the weights vary so much. I've seen a fairly recent report from Boeing discussing AOA with the majors, but as of now, I think it's still VERY optional, and the MFD with AOA on a side bar has to be specially ordered during the pre-sale spec meetings between the line main office and Boeing. Don't know about Airbus. Haven't heard anything there at all. Dudley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
If there are any pilots here that have ever flown aerial surveys.... | terrygeosearch | General Aviation | 0 | February 2nd 05 04:11 AM |
Indicator for Narco 12D | Mike Adams | Owning | 1 | July 6th 04 06:19 PM |
Inaccurate airspeed indicator | Wyatt Emmerich | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | April 20th 04 12:08 AM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Was The Grumman "Bearcat" Flown Off Carriers? | Kates Saloon and Knife Emporium | Naval Aviation | 71 | January 23rd 04 10:25 PM |