Japan to alow basing a Nuk carrier there.

"Michael Fenyes" wrote in message
oups.com...

Diamond Jim wrote:
"Thomas Schoene" wrote in message
ink.net...
Diamond Jim wrote:
On CNN I just saw where an agreement has been reached between the US
an Japan that will allow basing of a Nuke carrier there.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/asiapc....ap/index.html

As we are running out of conventional powered carriers, this means
we
will still be able to have a carrier based there in the future. I
wonder how long before they will allow subs, and other nuke powered
ships to be based there as well?

There are no "other nuke-powered ships" in the USN, just the carriers
and
submarines.

--
Tom Schoene Replace "invalid" with "net" to e-mail
"Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when
wrong to be put right." - Senator Carl Schurz, 1872


Well, it's not my fault that the Long Beach, Truxtun, and Bainbridge
were
decommissioned. You will have to blame someone else!

All California Class cruisers (both of them) were nukes as well.

You can't blame that on me either! And I didn't approve of getting rid of
the Virginia class at all.