A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GA's "fair share"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old November 4th 05, 08:07 PM
Steve Foley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default GA's

"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com...

By Jim May, President and CEO, Air Transport Association


Consider air traffic control (ATC). The writer, National Air
Transportation Association President James Coyne, argued that “the basic
rationale for ATC is … to protect airline passengers.” ATC actually exists
to provide safe guidance to all aircraft that utilize its services. Each
user should pay its fair share.


I agree with Coyne on this point. I'll never believe ATC was created to
serve GA.


The Airport and Airway Trust Fund is the primary funding source for FAA
operations and ATC. General aviation is a major user of FAA services,
accounting for 40 percent of flights handled by FAA centers, and 69
percent of operations handled by FAA towers. However, GA contributes less
than $200 million per year into the fund via fuel taxes—about 2 percent of
all user contributions. Commercial passenger and cargo airlines, and our
customers, pay the other 98 percent.


How quickly will the 40% drop off if I have to pay for each call? Does
anyone really believe that I will pay the same fee that a landing clearance
that a revenue-producing 747 will pay? So what happens whan I stop calling?
The FAA still has to pay the center controllers. They still have to maintain
the navigation aids. They'll simply have fewer people using the services,
and more unidentified targets on the radar screens.

As for the 69% of tower opertions, GA accounts for 100% of the traffic at
several local towered airports. The cities are hoping for the return of
commercial traffic, and don't want to let go of their precious towers. In
fact, the controllers frequently ask the local pilots association to
practice there to 'keep the numbers up'. The same question remains: When
they start charging for a landing clearance, what will the 69% drop to?

GA flights not using ATC still benefit from FAA Flight Service Stations,
which exclusively serve general aviation and cost the government $532
million annually—nearly three times more than GA pays into the Trust Fund.


I call flight services because I have to call flight services. I can get
better weather info on line, but I have to be sure my tail number is on
their tape so when an un-announced TFR shows up, I'm covered.


“[i]t is clear … that the current level of [GA] tax
payments does not cover the costs GA imposes on the FAA.”


Again, what are the incremental costs GA imposes? I can stop using those
services entirely. Delta cannot.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.