![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy.. After reading yours and Stephen's reply.. I concede I am mistaken
and you are correct. Dang.. and to think I was trying to be extra careful on this one too and figure out why the plate differences existed. I am getting pretty frustrated with myself lately, since I appear to be proven inaccurate more often than not with some of my replies on here, even though my intent was to be helpful. I think I am going to sit back and be a spectator for a while.. I dont want to be a resource if it ends up being a BAD resource. Dave Roy Smith wrote: In article .net, Dave S wrote: RUT LOC/DME 19 The DME is required.. and in this approach the DME is co-located with the localizer for 19. RUT LOC 19 (with DME) DME optional, but the DME for use in THIS approach is co-located with the VOR which is on-field, but sited differently from the Localizer. It looks to me like other than the step-downs at FISER and MAUVE on the feeder routes, all the DME callouts on both approaches reference I-RUT. Are you seeing something I'm not? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|