A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old November 7th 05, 09:18 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Boeing 747 & 777 autoland in crosswind certification video - impressive!

"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...
Well, at least we agree that something on the server side is the root
cause of the problem here.


I didn't realize that was ever in disagreement.

It doesn't "break" a standard to play a file even when the standard
doesn't
provide sufficient information to play it.


A straw man (or perhaps it's a non-sequitur). The standard does provide
enough information. What is happening here is that the server is lying
about what kind of file it is serving.


It's not a "straw man". You simply misinterpreted my meaning. By "the
standard doesn't provide sufficient information", all I mean is that the
instance of the use of the standard doesn't.

All the media player does is to try to make an educated guess as to what
was
actually intended


No, the media player is doing more than that. The media player is
*ignoring* the content-type information sent by the server.


As well it should, since that information is erroneous.

I tend to ignore erroneous information as well. Are you saying that you do
not?

Here's an aviation analogy: imagine that you had a magic gadget that
could convert Jet-A to 100LL. You install one of these on your
piston-powered airplane. Now when you fill up you can take either Jet-A
or 100LL. You no longer care. One day you get to an airport where the
pump marked 100LL is in fact dispensing Jet-A. From your point of view
this is not a problem. But from everyone else's point of view it is.

So... should everyone have to install one of these magic gadgets on
their planes? Or are the people without the gadget right to insist that
the fuel pumps ought to be marked correctly?

That is an exact analogy to the current situation.


No, it's not. Or if it does, it fails to prove your point.

In this current situation, Windows Media Player is the gadget, not the fuel
dispenser. The incorrectly labeled fuel dispenser is equivalent to the
server, not the media player.

If you want to complain about anyone, complain about the server serving up
the incorrect content type information, not the media player that correctly
figures out how to play the file in spite of that incorrect information.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(OT) What is Boeing up to??? Omega Piloting 0 April 24th 05 03:23 AM
Boeing Selling Out George Patterson Piloting 5 March 12th 05 10:47 PM
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 02:39 AM
763 Cruising Speed. [email protected] General Aviation 24 February 9th 04 09:30 PM
Aviation Conspiracy: AP Reveals Series Of Boeing 777 Fires!!! Bill Mulcahy General Aviation 18 October 16th 03 09:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.