![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think I'd be covered because I initiated the phone call. When they
first called and I said the checkbook had been stolen they told me to call 888-799-3059. I called them, ready to provide the name of the detective handling the case, and whatever else I could think of. The notes I took state: "Per Pearl on 1-27-05 failure to provide affividavid and police report may result in prosecution" I called the detective handling the case. He called the Reading police (where the store was that took the stolen check). The Reading police had no report on file from Wal-Mart. the detective called back and told me not to worry about it. The best part is that yesterday, my wife was summoned in the case (it was her handbag that had been stolen). Wal-Mart wasn't there. They never reported it, so they were not notified that an arrest had been made. The guy got 2 1/2 years, concurrent with other time for escaping custody. They told my wife she could pursue the stolen cash, but it wasn't that much cash, and would have involved multiple court appearances. I did send them a note on their website letting them know that an arrest had been made, and I was still waiting for my apology. They responded with an automated response that they could not assist me. Their loss. they are out several thousand dollars, between all their locations with checks and credit cards. "Skylune" wrote in message Steve: That sucks! I would check Mass statutes on consumer protection. Some states have laws prohibiting this kind of harassment. I would also write a letter to the Worcester Telgram and the Boston papers telling them about the treatment you are receiving by Walmart (or their hired gun bill collectors.) Walmart is trying to expand around these parts: the LAST thing they want is (more) bad publicity. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Sport Pilot pilots not insurable? | Blueskies | Piloting | 14 | July 12th 05 05:45 AM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |
Pilot Error? Is it Mr. Damron? | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 3 | June 23rd 04 04:05 PM |