![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK. I did not realize that *everything* gets added to the basis (even if it
was thrown away year ago and you arn't even selling it when you sell the airplane.) I guess it makes some sense since the business user would have deducted these costs over time. Mike MU-2 "TaxSrv" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote: I would definately add paint to the basis, particularly if it was done recently. It definately adds value to the airplane. The IRS has long ago ruled that paint on anything is not capital. If a very fresh paint, one might argue on the concept of "fixing-up expenses," if done after the intent to promptly sell was formed. How much of the upgraded avionics value was "consumed" during your ownership? Normally one would depreciate the avionics and have a basis for them, but is is fair to add the entire avionics cost to the airplane's basis if the avionics were added 15yrs and 2000hrs ago? Under long held principles of tax law -- yes. Add avionics from day one to basis, even if a box is ripped out and sold on eBay for $1. Even if gone thru 3 comms, trading in the old one each time. If, the day before I sell the airplane, I replace the autopilot servos that were 15yrs old when I bought the airplane and 20yrs old now, does that add to the basis? Depends if a repair was called for. Doesn't matter when done; repairs do not add to basis. Else, a possible fixing up expense if for purpose of sale. Don't know why somebody would replace working servos just to better sell it, unless owner is an A&P maybe. If, when the airplane was purchased, all the bushings in the landing gear pivots were worn out and replaced at the buyers expense, shouldn't that be factored into the basis? No, it's a repair. If you bought the airplane with a run out engine and overhauled the engine for $10K and TBO is 2000hrs and you have put 1000hrs on the engine, what should you do to the airplanes basis? If you just pro-rate you get $5K We don't prorate nuthin'. Even if you put 6,000 hours on the plane, and did three majors at 2,000 hrs each, under tax law your basis reflects a 4-engine airplane with one prop. What if you had to do a top overhaul for $5K at 900hrs? Sounds like a repair to me at only 900 on 2,000 TBO. No effect on basis. All these things are easy if the airplane was used for business and all expenses were either expensed or capitalized and depreciated leading to an unambigous basis. No, the rules on what is capital vs. repair do not change, personal or business asset. Tax law merely says no depreciation allowed for personal use portion, including100% personal. I think that there is so much ambiguity here. No, it's very simple for a personal asset, because we don't worry about the complexities of computing depreciation. For a personal asset, you may capitalize basically big items not in the nature of usual repairs. Except paint, which is a repair too. Fred F. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 14th 05 08:14 PM |
AmeriFlight Crash | C J Campbell | Piloting | 5 | December 1st 03 02:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |