![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 Kevin O'Brien wrote: On 2005-11-14 12:45:14 -0500, Evan Carew said: Interesting posts. I wonder if you would agree with me that the kit/small GA builders have wrung most of the fat out of the building process I'm not sure that's the case, because we're in the midst of several real industrial revolutions -- materials, automation, organizational. These add up to the possibility that we will see, someday soon, airplanes assembled on a line-production rather than a bespoke basis. Possibly, that is if you can afford the initial cost of 3D CAD & fixturing at your local manufacturing house. I currently make water treatment eq & typically spend ~ $8K / smallish device with moderate complexity to have the CAD work done. This would translate to a typical wing or fuse model in fiberglass with the moving parts ( metal models of the same structures would no doubt cost more). These same parts I have made up on CAD then cost me ~ $1.2K / unit with ~ $300 in materials costs to be made on CNC machines. I typically have 10 made at a time. The manufacturing house I use (one that typically makes transmissions for GM) tells me that if I go to 100 or more parts at a time, the price per part will come down to ~ $400. If you've ever tried to fit a factory airframe part (that cost an arm and a leg) to a Beech, you know what I mean. and that any further gains are in incremental productivity / materials handling procedures? If so, I wonder what you think could be realized in savings over the current processes? I know that everyone who's seen the Eclipse plant (including Dale Klapmeier) has been agog. Yeah, I've heard. Unfortunately, that tech isn't exactly what the average kit / small GA aircraft manufacturer can afford to include into their process. My understanding is that all of their FSW ops are under CNC control with special fixturing. [snip] To return to your question -- I do not think productivity in this industry is anywhere near where it could be, but the economics haven't been compelling enough to make anyone chase higher productivity, with the couple of exceptions noted. Sometimes people have mistaken getting wrapped around the axle of CAD, for increasing productivity. Two projects that were going to revolutionize the sport via CAD were the Prescott Pusher, and the DreamWings Valkyrie. Worth a search through the back threads of this group. I presume the CAD files of those two ghastly projects are still sitting in somebody's closet... for the sake of pilots yet unborn I pray that the guy's mother throws them out next time she cleans. Yeah well, organization doesn't always translate into producability. On that note, I seem to get a lot of feedback from this group about along exactly those lines. Either the respondents to this thread get hung up on the idea of design & cost, or are stuck on the idea of producing a final product. I can't seem to get anyone to twig to the idea that doing research into processes capable of reducing the labor involved in small parts count (lightly funded) ops has real merit for this interest group. Specifically, summarizing final findings down to a collection of process documents, associated costs, and estimates on final product impact. IF you take a look at the Eclipse site's tech section, its all about process. Every assembly is made so it fits in its assigned place precisely (CAD == known tolerances) and every assembly has an exactly known final assembly cost (manufacturing studies), and the sheet metal is but welded with an exotic process adapted to thin metal aluminum (process innovation). I have to do that for my business in the water quality eq biz, why don't we do it in this biz? If there was someone who was, they'd eat everybody else's lunch... oh wait, isn't that Eclipse? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDfR7KpxCQXwV2bJARAk7UAKCHiDsqMvZn9Dx9SLprSZ ph5pBxEwCfYNxQ hhzJWjNBdhlQoDN5MbOKUss= =Sn1w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Enjoy High Quality incredible low cost PC-to-phone and broadband phone services | John | Home Built | 0 | May 19th 05 02:58 PM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
Could it happen he The High Cost of Operating in Europe | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 5 | July 14th 03 02:34 AM |