![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew Gideon wrote: I'm no freight dog or corporate pilot with dozens of approaches to minimums each day. For me, as with many GA pilots I expect, maintaining *real* currency involves explicit practice. That's fine; I enjoy it. But I'd like to try some new places. The issue is that I'd like to try some new places that are friendly about multiple approaches. For example, at both ABE and STW I've almost never had a problem terminating an approach in a T&G or low approach and heading out immediately for another (or picking up a clearance for the next leg). I've tried TTN, but they always insist upon my landing and picking up my next clearance on the ground. It sounds like you are doing your practicing under IFR. That's probably a good idea from the POV of working within the system and practicing procedures with a real controller. I don't feel the need to do that. I do all my practicing under VFR, unless weather dictates otherwise. Controllers here (Raleigh, NC) are usually happy to accomodate requests for VFR practice approaches. Sometimes they get too busy for that, so I terminate radar advisories and do full procedures (no vectors). I usually do my approaches at nearby non-towered fields that are under the Raleigh TRACON jurisdiction, followed by an approach to a full stop at RDU, where I'm based. But, answering your original question, the Raleigh TRACON is usually a little more accommodating than Center. We also have some military controllers nearby (Seymour Johnson) that own some of the approaches and they're usually willing to accommodate practice approaches. It took several tries at TTN before I got the message, but in it eventually sankgrin. So what airports are more like ABE and STW, where approach is willing to provide a clearance in the air and permit multiple approaches? Of course, I'm interested in the area around my "home airport" (CDW in Northern NJ), but I expect that others are interested in the same thing elsewhere. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RNAV approaches | Kevin Chandler | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | September 18th 03 06:00 PM |
Which of these approaches is loggable? | Paul Tomblin | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | August 16th 03 05:22 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |
Garmin Behind the Curve on WAAS GPS VNAV Approaches | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 18th 03 01:43 PM |
NDB approaches -- what are they good for? | Dylan Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | July 10th 03 09:15 PM |