![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard
some parts of the country do not have many NDB's, The two around me that I know of are both are in different states. Utah and california, so I really get no use out of my ADF. I do have the garmin 430 and I kept the ADF and DME for backup but as I said, I never get the opportunity to use it. An approach certified GPS will do you alot more good then the ADF. Richard Hertz wrote: Wow - I finally read something worth reading on this newsgroup. Thanks Michael. (And for once I am not being facetious!) I don't have an adf in my plane - I wish I did. I have just two VOR receivers. An ADF would get me into a bunch of other places and it is nice to have the extra functionality. (especially like LOMs) "Grumman 123, LOM inbound" "huh?" "Michael" wrote in message om... "Mike Rapoport" wrote Wow! I can't believe all the posts recommending ways of disabling the ADF! Why not? Once you buy into the idea that an instrument rating isn't actually very useful in the sort of airplane he will be flying, and is just a piece of paper to get, it makes all the sense in the world. Disabling the ADF makes the piece of paper easier to get. Dumbing down the test so that you can pass it is not a good idea and that philosophy is not going to make anyone good at anything. Except passing tests. I like the idea of using a flightsim to practice. I do too, especially since you can (a) stop the action to think while you're coming up to speed and (b) get a track showing what you did immediately afterwards. I also think that NDB approaches are the second-best exercise in situational awareness available - NDB holds are the first. Once situational awareness is mastered, it actually takes very little time to learn NDB approaches. Thus my advice is this - focus on knowing where on the approach plate you are, every minute. Know where the wind is coming from. It's perfectly legitimate to draw a wind arrow on the approach plate once you figure out the wind, and it can make visualizing your correction easier. Remember, the procedure turn is not cast in stone. You can go more than a minute outbound before turning 180, and if there's a stiff headwind from that direction you probably should. How many degrees you should lead your turn onto the FAC becomes obvious when you keep wind and distance from the beacon in mind. Keep in mind that heading, bearing (absolute and relative), course, and track are all different things. Know the differences. Once you get to that point, you won't need the rules, the mnemonics, the tricks, or any of the rest of that garbage. The corrections will become intuitive. Thus I have a suggestion about the best way to use flight sim. If you are not sure what the needle is telling you or how to correct, DON'T GUESS. Stop the action and figure it out, then start again. You will find that with time, you will not need to stop anymore. At that point, start doing them in the plane. I think you will discover that a couple of hours is all it will take to become proficient. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Correcting Poly-Brush mistake | Craig Foster | Home Built | 31 | November 23rd 03 01:55 PM |