![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Derek Copeland" wrote in message ... At 22:42 04 December 2005, Don Johnstone wrote: The answer to the whiplash question is very simple and whiplash describes the action which causes the injury. When a car, or glider decelerates very rapidly, the head, which is unrestrained and has a fairly high mass continues to move forward until it is stopped at full body extension. It then whips back and if there is nothing to stop it extends backwards, that is what causes the injury. It is correct that a headrest prevents injury in a rear shunt but that is not the primary cause of 'whiplash' injuries. It is the whipping action following a sudden deceleration. I suppose if an impact in a glider is severe enough to cause the whiplash then that injury may be the least of your problems as you are much closer to the crash in a glider than you are in a car. -------------------------------------- I actually did an instructional flight in the back seat of a DG1000 today, and was reminded how poor the forward visibility from the rear cockpit is. You have to peer though a small semi-circular gap between the canopy hoop, the front headrest and the student's head. The forward view is far worse than in a K13 with its one piece canopy, and not helped by the fact that you sit fairly low down in the cockpit. I think that I will make a point of only flying this type with well switched on students who keep a good look out! I suppose that it's a case of what is the greater risk. Whiplash in the event of a crash or heavy landing, or a head on mid-air collision with another aircraft because you can't see ahead? BTW I don't dislike the DG1000. It handles and performs beautifully, it has good airbrakes (unlike the Duo Discus), it is fully aerobatic in 18 metre mode (unlike the Duo) and you can operate the undercarriage from both cockpits (unlike the Duo). BUT, I don't like the restricted view from the rear cockpit, the difficult and heavy ground handling, getting in and out of the thing, and the trigger type trimmer mounted on the stick that doesn't seem to work. You end up trimming with the trimmer tell-tale knob on the side of the cockpit wall, so why bother with the trigger in the first place? Good try for the ideal trainer DG, but no cigar yet! Derek Copeland P.S. The r.a.s. black hole seems to re-appeared. this is my third attempt at posting this! It does seem like the cockpits just keep getting worse. Maybe someone should just try to improve the old Grob 103. Putting everything else aside, the cockpit was nice. Maybe the perfect trainer will be the Stemme S2 - if they ever build it. Bill Daniels |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Advice and experts with 400 series Cessnas (414 and 421), purchase and training | [email protected] | Owning | 36 | January 9th 05 02:32 AM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
UK pilots start Apache training | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 13th 03 10:37 PM |