A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Crankshaft balance



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old December 7th 05, 04:39 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Crankshaft balance


I had it tested at an FBO that does prop balance and they found about
0.2 ips at the prop (FAA acceptable) and about 0.4 (+?) ips at the
other end and told me it was the engine.


R1.... .2 ips is 'faa acceptable' but any tech should be able to get it
below 0.1 ips.
Sometimes I see a cross-effect in which the rear is running big because
of a prop being installed in an angle that is not optimun. Another factor
is the static weights on the prop itself. The adjustment may resolve an aft
imbalance. What was the phase angle difference?
However in most cases it is a crank or rod imblance that is probably
causing it.



But as Ben said I
could probably do the pistons/rods myself with a good scale. But
balancing complex rotating masses like a crankshaft requires a proper
machine.


R2. You need more than a scale for the rods. A rod is suspended by each
end and in turn the big ends and the small ends are weighed, the C.G. is
deduced. In other words the rotating and the reciprocating masses are
measured. Auto guys will then make up a bobweight of nuts and bolts
equal to the rotating part which they add to the crank throws and that is
then spun on a dynamic balance machine.



Sorry, I disagree that automotive people can do a better job.
How many auto shops check the nitriding and heat treatment?



R3: The issue isn't RPM unless you are relating to 'flexible or
non-flexible rotors'
Typically Auto cranks are balanced by drilling the counterweights a little
deeper or what ever.
I can't say about Franklins, but Lycomings and Continentals do not have
counterweight molding in
the casting because the arrangement is a 'balanced' engine in the 1`st order
by design.


In the 'approved' after market, Lyc and Cont cranks are further balanced
the same at the mfg does but to a finer degree.
in my experience, it hasn't been whether is the balance is better than '3
mils' as the factory print specifies, but rather it has been making sure
you do have not a sloppy part with some 40- 80 gram-inches imbalnce that
slipped out the door!

good luck

Kent Felkins






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pocket PC Weight and Balance Spreadsheet Navzilla Support Piloting 0 October 9th 05 11:47 PM
Cessna 172 F Weight and Balance [email protected] Owning 8 September 22nd 05 02:38 AM
crankshaft counterweights Dave Butler Owning 10 February 10th 05 04:08 PM
Wierd vibration -- Prop or engine, balance or not??? Chuck Owning 17 December 1st 04 02:12 PM
Grob102 elevator balance mods OscarCVox Soaring 0 April 1st 04 11:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.