![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I had it tested at an FBO that does prop balance and they found about 0.2 ips at the prop (FAA acceptable) and about 0.4 (+?) ips at the other end and told me it was the engine. R1.... .2 ips is 'faa acceptable' but any tech should be able to get it below 0.1 ips. Sometimes I see a cross-effect in which the rear is running big because of a prop being installed in an angle that is not optimun. Another factor is the static weights on the prop itself. The adjustment may resolve an aft imbalance. What was the phase angle difference? However in most cases it is a crank or rod imblance that is probably causing it. But as Ben said I could probably do the pistons/rods myself with a good scale. But balancing complex rotating masses like a crankshaft requires a proper machine. R2. You need more than a scale for the rods. A rod is suspended by each end and in turn the big ends and the small ends are weighed, the C.G. is deduced. In other words the rotating and the reciprocating masses are measured. Auto guys will then make up a bobweight of nuts and bolts equal to the rotating part which they add to the crank throws and that is then spun on a dynamic balance machine. Sorry, I disagree that automotive people can do a better job. How many auto shops check the nitriding and heat treatment? R3: The issue isn't RPM unless you are relating to 'flexible or non-flexible rotors' Typically Auto cranks are balanced by drilling the counterweights a little deeper or what ever. I can't say about Franklins, but Lycomings and Continentals do not have counterweight molding in the casting because the arrangement is a 'balanced' engine in the 1`st order by design. In the 'approved' after market, Lyc and Cont cranks are further balanced the same at the mfg does but to a finer degree. in my experience, it hasn't been whether is the balance is better than '3 mils' as the factory print specifies, but rather it has been making sure you do have not a sloppy part with some 40- 80 gram-inches imbalnce that slipped out the door! good luck Kent Felkins |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pocket PC Weight and Balance Spreadsheet | Navzilla Support | Piloting | 0 | October 9th 05 11:47 PM |
Cessna 172 F Weight and Balance | [email protected] | Owning | 8 | September 22nd 05 02:38 AM |
crankshaft counterweights | Dave Butler | Owning | 10 | February 10th 05 04:08 PM |
Wierd vibration -- Prop or engine, balance or not??? | Chuck | Owning | 17 | December 1st 04 02:12 PM |
Grob102 elevator balance mods | OscarCVox | Soaring | 0 | April 1st 04 11:32 PM |