![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You sure have been away for a few years. As George said, in Adminstrator vs
Bowen, in 1974, the Administrative Law Judge said, more or less, "known does not mean a near-certainty of icing conditions, only that icing conditions are being reported or forecast." This was updated, and re-emphasized in 2005. Read this: http://www.aopa.org/members/files/pi...05/pc0508.html In a case not noted in either source, the NTSB referred to pilot reports as "anectodal evidence" and said that pilots had to rely on government reports, period. This 2005 case gives pilot reports a little more slack. Bob Gardner "Jim Carter" wrote in message et... George, I've been away for a few years, but when did forecast icing become known icing without a pirep or physical indications on the ground? If they are the same thing now days, why are aircraft certified for "Flight in known icing (FIKI)" and not just flight in icing conditions? -----Original Message----- From: George Patterson ] Posted At: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:16 AM Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr Conversation: Flying through known or forecast icing Subject: Flying through known or forecast icing Bob Gardner wrote: George, your heart is in the right place...but if you think that someone at ATC has a pad of ticket forms just ready to write you up, you are sadly mistaken. I was told by an officer of the controller's union that controllers are not interested in the certification status of an airplane or a pilot. No, I don't think "they" are just waiting to write me up, but the OP asked if it was *legal*, and it's not. A former Assistant Administrator for Regulations and Certification told me that it is the pilot who encounters icing conditions and makes no attempt to escape who would get a violation...but only if that failure resulted in an accident/incident or required special handling by ATC. No one at a Center operating position knows if a pilot climbs or descends through a cloud. I've been told that too; however, I'm not going to go through clouds without an IFR clearance, and I wouldn't take either of the aircraft I've owned through an area in which icing has been reported. Now, if icing had only been *forecast* in that area but not reported, and the bottom of the cloud deck was well above minimums, I would chance it. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Issues around de-ice on a 182 | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 87 | September 27th 05 11:46 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Have you ever... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 229 | May 6th 05 08:26 PM |
Known Icing requirements | Jeffrey Ross | Owning | 1 | November 20th 04 03:01 AM |
Wife agrees to go flying | Corky Scott | Piloting | 29 | October 2nd 03 06:55 PM |