![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Benjamin Gawert wrote:
Charles Talleyrand schrieb: Suppose a smaller airplane with it's fly-by-wire controls goes runs out of fuel. All the engines quit. On a larger jet a ram air turbine would drop into the airstream and power the controls. How does it work on smaller planes like the Dassault Falcon or the F-16? The Panavia 200 Tornado has a EPS battery (one shot battery) that in case of double engine out situations supplies a few instruments and an electric pump to have some hydraulic pressure. This allows maintaining control over the a/c for ~5-7 (max 10) minutes. These EPS (Emergency Power System) Batteries are usually known as "Thermal Batteries". They have an eutectic electrolyte of salts that are melted by a pyrotechnical charge. Because the electrolyte is inert and sold untill melted shelf lives of 20+ years are possible. Because of the high opperating temperature very high power densities are possible. 20 years would not be full life for an airliner and a ram air turbine I suggest would require less maintenance. (ie it doesn't ever need replacement) Thermal batteries appear to be the battery of choice for missiles. I did read though that the early MANPAD Stingers handed over to the Mujahidine had thermal batteries that would now be failing and thus (thankfully) rendering the missiles inopperational. The Panavia Tornado also has Nickel Cadmium Secondary rechargeable batteries (perhaps upgraded to NiMH now?) for APU starting and other power. I suspect that these could keep the system up for a few minutes on their own if in good condition. Alternatively, I've always wondered if one could not keep a special reserve tank for the APU. When the engines quit, the APU automatically starts to power the controls. Would such a system be safe and would it be certifiable? Would it weigh less than the existing system? I a lot of airplanes the APUs (resp. their intakes and exhausts) are mounted in a way that they can't be used inflight. This would hardly apply to the Tornado. Tornado however uses its entire slab sided botton fueselage for weapons: there is little room for ram air turbine. Besides that, if there still is fuel in the tanks it's better served for keeping the engine alive than just the APU... Benjamin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Thunderstorm - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 11:05 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |