![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andrew Sarangan wrote: I realize that that is what the AIM says, but why are they to be used for emergencies only? I always interpreted the MSA as the minimum altitude to use when flying off-feeder routes (direct to the IAF), sort of like the OROCA when flying off-airways. In many countries MSAs are operational altitudes. They are not in the United States. And, in a designated mountainous area you are required by 91.177 to have 2,000 feet vertically or 4 miles laterally when off a published route or segment. MSAs are not IFR altitudes, routes, or segments. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Reasoning behind course reversal | Michael 182 | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | February 27th 04 03:27 PM |
Requirement to fly departure procedures | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 77 | October 15th 03 06:39 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |