![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Benjamin Gawert wrote: Eunometic schrieb: The PA200 Tornado is fully FBW with a mechanical linkage backup system... Benjamin Then why does it need a thermal backup battery to remain airborn? Because besides power for certain important instruments and the radio the EPS battery also powers an electric motor that powers a hydraulic pump. "Mechanical linkage" does not mean that the stick is connected to pushrods and levers that move the control surfaces (which would be silly on a fighter/bomber aircraft with up to ~55000 pounds weight). Which means that PA200 Tornado when using 'mechanical' backup is actually fully power opperated as opposed to power assisted (power assisted can be designed to connect into a fully manual system with limited movement). Given the need for power it doesn't seem to make much sense to bother to use a mechanical system at all. An additional layer of redundancy and an 'analog' backup would be better use of the weight. Perhaps Panavia was worried about Electromagnetic Pulse or Weapons. I believe F-16 uses fiber optics. When in so-called "mech mode" the stick is connected to several hydraulic valves that control the hydraulic actuators. So you need hydraulics pressure, and in cases of double engine out this hydraulic pressure comes from an electric pump that powered by the EPS battery. In normal operation the potentiometers connected to the stick submit stick position data to the flight control system (CSAS and SPILS) which calculate the necessary control surface deflection and control the corresponding actuators. They use potentiometers? I though LVDT were normally used. The mechanical linkage is inactive (in emergencies the stick gets linked to the mechanical controls through a honeycomb block which gets squeezed by the stick movement applied by the panicing pilot ;-) This applies to the GR versions (bomber), I don't know if the F versions are somewhat different. Benjamin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
Thunderstorm - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 11:05 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |