![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matthew S. Whiting wrote:
Dave Butler wrote: Bob Gardner wrote: "Maintain 2200 until established, cleared for the ILS." Do you report leaving 2200 when the glideslope comes down? Nope, I don't. The glideslope coming down is not a "newly assigned altitude". No, but you are leaving a previously assigned altitude which is your original point as I recall. And the point is that once cleared for the approach, you are also cleared to enter and leave all altitudes from that point until you are on the runway. My "original point" is that we should do what the AIM says with regard to reporting leaving assigned altitudes for a newly assigned altitude. The AIM says (paraphrasing) that you should report when leaving an assigned altitude *for a newly assigned altitude*. I viewed a clearance for a visual approach as a newly assigned altitude. As a result of this discussion, I no longer hold that view. I never viewed a falling glideslope needle as a newly assigned altitude. Dave Remove SHIRT to reply directly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
ALTRAK pitch system flight report | optics student | Home Built | 2 | September 21st 03 11:49 PM |