![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message ...
Andrew Sarangan wrote: I agree that MSA does not satisfy the altitudes in mountainous areas. But in nonmountainous areas MSA does satisfy the altitude requirements. What am I missing here? That they are not published as IFR altitudes under either of the pertinent IFR alitude regulations, Part 95 or Part 97. True, but under the circumstances Andrew described (flying off-route direct to an IAF), Parts 95 and 97 do not prescribe a minimum altitude. Hence, 91.177a2 applies. In a non-mountainous area, 91.177a2ii specifies a condition that can be assured by reference to the MSA. --Gary |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Reasoning behind course reversal | Michael 182 | Instrument Flight Rules | 26 | February 27th 04 03:27 PM |
Requirement to fly departure procedures | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 77 | October 15th 03 06:39 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |