![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Larry Dighera posted:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:10:26 GMT, "Neil Gould" wrote in : : Why couldn't receipts be counted by hand? As a method of verification, the task isn't all that large. Still, if the receipts followed a standard layout, they could be counted by machine quite easily. What method would you employ to assure that the receipts are not forgeries? The same method that assures that paper ballots aren't forgeries. If you go back a few messages, I suggested that *two* receipts would be printed & verified by the voter; one would be given to the polling official, just as paper ballots are handled now. Then, at least one machine selected at random from each precinct would have its electronic tally audited against the receipt. In the case of a discrepancy, a 100% audit would be performed at that precinct. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aircraft Spruce: Abused Customers and Fourteen More Angry Comments -- More to Come | jls | Home Built | 2 | February 6th 05 08:32 AM |
If true, this makes me really angry (Buzzing Pilot kills 9 year-old son) | Hilton | Piloting | 2 | November 29th 04 05:02 AM |
millionaire on the Internet... in weeks! | Malcolm Austin | Soaring | 0 | November 5th 04 11:14 PM |
JEWS AND THE WHITE SLAVE TRADE | B2431 | Military Aviation | 16 | March 1st 04 11:04 PM |
Enemies Of Everyone | Grantland | Military Aviation | 5 | September 16th 03 12:55 PM |