![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fo me, the airplane was much of the issue. My clubs complex single (Piper
Lance) was pretty solidly scheduled, and when it wasn't scheduled, it was down for various maintenance issues. Add to that an engine that passed TBO and my determination was that the risk of the airplane being unavailable when the checkride was due became too great. The club has two 172's and a 182, so I knew I wouldn't have a problem showing up for the checkride with an airplane. I'm considering adding my multi-engine airplane rating to my instructor certificate next, and will finish up with single-engine, preventing the need to bother with a complex single all together. In the meantime, I'm instructing instrument students while I work on the rest of my ratings. As to the point of taking the CFI-I at the FSDO because it is the easiest, keep in mind that you are still tested on all of the FOI material and must plan and conduct a lesson, so its substantially more than a CFI-I add-on. Maybe a better way to frame this is that it's a matter of dividing the instructor checkrides into more manageable pieces. Others have also suggested that starting as an instructor of pilots who already know how to fly is somehow "easier", or a way to ease into flight instruction. My experience has been that while this may or may not be true, an instrument instructor spends a fair amount of time correcting bad habits formed over the time since the student passed their private checkride (and in some cases before). Nevertheless, even if I never instruct a primary student, I will still get my airplane instructor ratings. Brad Z. "Michael" wrote in message om... Mark Kolber wrote As to why, it's pretty hokey, but there's some theory going around that the CFI-I is easier, so, if you have to have an inspector for the first ride, it might as well be the easier one. The real reason is a little different. For all practical purposes, you can't rent a complex airplane that isn't decades old. Any determined fed can ground an airplane that old, and that's normal practice in many FSDO's. If you go for an initial CFI ride in many cases you get three inspectors - one ops and two maintenance. The ops inspector starts your oral, and the maintenance inspectors start going over the airplane. Oral ends when they ground it, and you get a pink slip and, if you have the temerity to question their determination (airplane not airworthy because the placard is curled up/TSO tag on seatbelt unreadable/repair or alteration logged in logbook is major, not minor, and requires Form 337) or the inspector just doesn't like you, you get written up for flying an unairworthy airplane as well. I know people who have had this happen, and there's at least one CFI on this newsgroup who has his own story of something very similar. The CFII ride need not be in a complex airplane - and new full-IFR C-172's are available for rent all over. It's very difficult to ground a new airplane. Thus I recommend that anyone doing an initial CFI go over to a place that rents new C-172's and do the CFII first. I did my initial CFI in a glider for the same reason - a new glider was locally available for rent, and there was no way to flunk it because it was new and completely unmodified - everything was just the way it came from the factory. Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where is approach good about multiple approaches and clearances in the air? | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 29 | February 14th 04 02:51 AM |
Zzzz Campbell's Second Lawsuit Against Sun-N-Fun Zzzz | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 23 | October 6th 03 02:09 PM |
Aerial duel to the death - count to ten then Fire! | pac plyer | Home Built | 18 | August 12th 03 12:35 AM |