![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"clipclip" .
i'd say pretty much the same thing but in a different way - i have seen many well-off pilots who (implicitly) think that having a glass cockpit with the latest of everything is almost equivalent to a force field that will protect them against anything - and if it doesn't, the BRS will. We keep hearing about these guys but they don't ever seem to say this anywhere we can verify it. Can you? the toys and gadgets distract the pilot from the real task at hand - which is to fly well within the performance envelope. the fatal accident record of the cirrus seems to support that. IIRC, its fatal crash rate is higher than that of the rest of the GA fleet (someone correct me if i'm wrong No. Your assertion. You back it up. i also seem to remember that insuring a cirrus is limited to one (or very few companies) and carries a very high rate because of these incidents. Evidence. That's not my experience. Except in Canada. But that has nothing to do with the accident rate. that fact seems to get forgotten when the plane is sold as a "safest" and "foolproof" plane. Not my experience. And I've been through the sales pitch. Have you? How do you know how they sell it? most if not all the plane's mag reviews seem to emphasize how failures are very unlikely or quasi-impossible. What type of "failures"? There's rather a lot, you know. however, some recent cirrus accidents make the point - consider the recent one where the pilot with low hours and a brand new plane took off with his family, flew into IMC and perished. consider the pilot who flew over the cascades, seems to have taken on severe icing, and tried to deploy his chute which didn't function properly. or another pilot who was seen doing slow steep turns and stalls at low altitude and finally got the plane to spin into the ground. ... and i could bore you with many more examples. unfortunately, this type of accident seems to be too frequent in this airframe. Again, you got some comparitive cites? IMO, a serious commitment to airmanship, pilotage, and remaining well away from the ragged bleeding edges of the performance envelope is the only way to significantly improve the safety of flying. the truly weak link in flying an airplane is the payload in the front left seat. I don't think you'll find anyone who doubts that here. m |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lancaster California: Another Fatal Cirrus Crash | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 63 | March 31st 06 09:34 AM |
Yet another A36 crash | H.P. | Piloting | 10 | April 23rd 05 05:58 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Another Cirrus crash | James L. Freeman | Piloting | 42 | April 24th 04 11:21 PM |
Cirrus SR20 Fatal Crash in SC | Richard Kaplan | Piloting | 24 | April 22nd 04 10:47 AM |