A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

I think I know why so many Cirrus' crash



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #36  
Old January 18th 06, 12:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default I think I know why so many Cirrus' crash

"clipclip" .

i'd say pretty much the same thing but in a different way - i have seen
many well-off pilots who (implicitly) think that having a glass cockpit
with the latest of everything is almost equivalent to a force field
that will protect them against anything - and if it doesn't, the BRS
will.



We keep hearing about these guys but they don't ever seem to say this
anywhere we can verify it. Can you?

the toys and gadgets distract the pilot from the real task at
hand - which is to fly well within the performance envelope. the fatal
accident record of the cirrus seems to support that. IIRC, its fatal
crash rate is higher than that of the rest of the GA fleet (someone
correct me if i'm wrong


No. Your assertion. You back it up.

i also seem to remember that insuring a cirrus is
limited to one (or very few companies) and carries a very high rate
because of these incidents.


Evidence. That's not my experience. Except in Canada. But that has
nothing to do with the accident rate.

that fact seems to get forgotten when the plane is sold as a "safest"
and "foolproof" plane.


Not my experience. And I've been through the sales pitch. Have you? How
do you know how they sell it?

most if not all the plane's mag reviews seem to
emphasize how failures are very unlikely or quasi-impossible.


What type of "failures"? There's rather a lot, you know.
however,

some recent cirrus accidents make the point - consider the recent one
where the pilot with low hours and a brand new plane took off with his
family, flew into IMC and perished. consider the pilot who flew over
the cascades, seems to have taken on severe icing, and tried to deploy
his chute which didn't function properly. or another pilot who was seen
doing slow steep turns and stalls at low altitude and finally got the
plane to spin into the ground. ... and i could bore you with many more
examples. unfortunately, this type of accident seems to be too frequent
in this airframe.


Again, you got some comparitive cites?

IMO, a serious commitment to airmanship, pilotage, and remaining well
away from the ragged bleeding edges of the performance envelope is the
only way to significantly improve the safety of flying. the truly weak
link in flying an airplane is the payload in the front left seat.


I don't think you'll find anyone who doubts that here.

m


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lancaster California: Another Fatal Cirrus Crash Larry Dighera Piloting 63 March 31st 06 09:34 AM
Yet another A36 crash H.P. Piloting 10 April 23rd 05 05:58 PM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Another Cirrus crash James L. Freeman Piloting 42 April 24th 04 11:21 PM
Cirrus SR20 Fatal Crash in SC Richard Kaplan Piloting 24 April 22nd 04 10:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.