![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An approach is where a VOR accuracy really matters. If you are off by a
few degrees during enroute, the worst that can happen is an annoyed controller. During approach the outcome may be a lot worse. Would you fly a VOR approach to minimum if you are not sure if the VOR has not been checked? "Dan Thompson" wrote in m: I bet you are right. Since it is not possible to fly under IFR below 1000 AGL, except taking off or on an approach, what difference does that make? "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message . 158... "Dan Thompson" wrote in . com: Well, since practically everybody uses GPS, and radar coverage is essentially nationwide now, making sure your VOR is accurate within a couple of degrees every 30 days, and also keeping a detailed record of that, seems a bit out of date. Kind of like making sure your buggy whip is in good condition every 30 days. Radar coverage does not extend nationwide at low altitudes. In fact I would bet that 99% of the country does not have radar coverage below 1000' AGL. This is where VOR accuracy really matters anyway. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 03:09 AM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
Simpy One of Many Stories of a Time Not So Long Ago | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 40 | March 16th 04 06:35 PM |
IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations | David B. Cole | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | February 24th 04 07:51 PM |