![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes..all good points...
But certianly a flub on their part, and the 11 ft of cable is not necessarily convenient. On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:33:30 -0500, Jonathan Goodish wrote: The magnets aren't a big deal--really. Garmin provides a total of 11 feet of cable to run the XM receiver well away from the compass if the magnets bother you. The cowl just seems to be the fav place for most ofus, remember many users of the portable units are renters, and do not have the luxury of "installing 11 ft of cable" to get around this issue. The folks who find the magnets absolutely unacceptable appear to be a very small minority of consumers. Possibly, but seems to be a significant %age of the few who use the XM option.. but I have no data on this, or ever will have.. My point, though, was that Garmin does NOT use magnets in their GPS antennas, Correct and Lowrance does NOT have XM capability. Yet,...... lately, the DO have a habit of delivering on what they say they will... Personally, I'm willing to live with the magnets (though I agree their presence is puzzling) to get a capability that Lowrance cannot deliver. Who's to say that Lowrance won't have magnets in their XM unit, if they ever bring one to market? I hope they are wise enough to at least learn from Garmin's mistake.. Being "second" in introducing a new feature is not always a bad thing.. ![]() We will see... Cheers! Dave JKG In article , Dave wrote: Ummm.. but when you want to use the XM Rx, they DO have magnets, and they want to install them in a light aircraft, and they affect the compass, and , and, and, ..... On some other pilots groups, there is much discussion and disgust... It's a hot topic, and costing Garmin reputation.. The magnets are very difficult to remove, and removal (they have made it very clear) will void the warranty, do not admit it is a problem or concern, and (apparently so far) have no intention of correcting it.. (according to Garmin replies pasted in the NG's) And the XM is expected soon for the Lowrance... I do not own anAviation Garmin, what I relate here is from others who do, and thet appear quite dissappointed.. Dave On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:30:34 -0500, Jonathan Goodish wrote: In article , Dave wrote: We like it very much, has exceeded our expectations.... And NO FREAKING MAGNETS in the antenna with instructions to mount it on the cowl!! (beside the compass) !! WHAT was Garmin thinking?? Garmin's antennas do not contain magnets. The issue with magnets and the Garmin 396 has to do with the XM receiver. As far as I know, Lowrance doesn't have XM capability. JKG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AirMap 1000 - 2000 , Great CS from Lowrance | Dave | Piloting | 4 | September 8th 05 02:10 AM |
Smooth Lowrance Airmap 1000 updates | Longworth | Piloting | 2 | August 16th 05 01:52 AM |
Problem with Lowrance Database Update? | Stuart Grant | Piloting | 5 | December 24th 04 03:16 AM |
Portable GPS Sugggestion (Lowrance vs Garmin) | Pudealee | Piloting | 0 | September 6th 04 05:19 AM |
GPSMAP 195/196 vs. Lowrance AIPMAP 1000 | JJS | Piloting | 4 | March 9th 04 08:14 PM |