![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:09:18 -0500, "Gary Drescher"
wrote: "Michael" wrote in message .. . Still, it was a bumpy approach about 100 feet above minimums, and I had enough going on without playing with frequency changes. Reinforced to me how important currency is - if I was not reasonably current in IFR skills it might have been much more challenging. Not to dispute your conclusion or the importance of being current, but it's also worth pointing out that if the workload had been too great, you could have executed a missed approach and then dealt with the radio problem under more relaxed circumstances--or you could even have considered it a lost-comm situation and just flown the approach without worrying about the radios. --Gary I'm not sure I would consider a missed approach under single pilot IFR with a wing-leveler autopilot and very bumpy IMC more relaxed circumstances. But, hey, if I can't handle this stuff I shouldn't be flying in IMC... Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lost comm -- what would you do? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | December 1st 05 03:57 PM |
Lost comm while VFR in Class Bravo | Roy Smith | General Aviation | 10 | April 23rd 04 11:12 PM |
Lost comm altitude? | Roy Smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | January 11th 04 12:29 AM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
Lost comm - Arrival | Michael 182 | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 28th 03 12:04 AM |