If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
How Quickly Things Can Turn!
Y'All,
A friend of mine wanted to get his plane from Concord CA to Auburn CA a bit early for his annual to avoid a series of storms shortly to arrive in Northern CA. He called me at 9 A. M and we were ready to depart at 11AM. We planned to make separate departures using ATC radar advisories while monitoring 122.85 if something came up. I got started out first and waited in the runup areas until my friend appeared to make my departure. We had agreed to fly below 3000' AGL. He flew at 2700 and I flew at 2900 AGL We did not tell ATC that we were together. At one point I was quired by ATC as to why I chose to fly at 2900. My response was that not very many pilots make a practice of flying such an altitude. and it becamse apparent as we encountered any number of other aircraft flying at 2000;.500 and 3000. It soon became apparent that our altlitude selection was a good idea. Between Sacramento and Auburn there was a bank of cumulus what got in the way. Since I was in front I made the choice of flying over insead of below the clouds even though the one-minute-weather out of Auburn gave bases of 1500. My choice was based upon the probability of greater turbulence below the clouds while flying into rising terrain. My friend, a few miles behind made the same choice. He had GPS while I was strickly pilotage. Things did not get much better so I advised ATC that I would descend in VFR and my friend behind did likewise. The GPS made it possible for him to do so right over Auburn but I was about three miles away to the North. Now we come to the point of my contribution. In my descent I became totally disoriented as to where to find Auburn. I immediately advised ATC that I would require vectors on descent below the clouds. I was giving a heading of 264-degrees. Usually a vector is not so precise so I quired for a repeat. He was right on. With excellent visibility 10-15 miles too low to see the airport runway but I did see the buildings, I continued on that heading. Almost immediately ATC gave me a terrain alert and a collision alert. I was at about 500'AGL and in conflict with my friend who was on downwind. I did not see him until I came out of the ATC recommended left climbing turn for avoidance. When I came out of my turn I was on left base for 25 and my friend was on final. We both proceeded to land with no problem What I am getting at is that a major block facing most pilots who get into problem situation is not knowing how or when to ask for and get help. My friend with his GPS had no problem. Pilotage alone was not going to work for me under the low ceilings so I used ATC as my 'GPS' and had no problem either. We met at the restaurant, had lunch and did the planning for the annual soon to depart back to Concord in my plane. I let him fly right seat for the experience. We probably saved him a week's delay in getting his annual. Moral: You don't need to know everything or to solve all flying problems on your own. The more you know the more willing you will be to ask for help. Gene Whitt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Procedure turn required? | Peter Duniho | Instrument Flight Rules | 80 | July 6th 05 08:12 PM |
What's considered a steep turn by the airlines? | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 3 | June 23rd 05 03:59 PM |
IFR in the 1930's | Del Rawlins | Owning | 33 | September 11th 03 07:42 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |