![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since this topic is being beat into submission as usual, I'll
add a pet peeve of a lot of controllers I know, myself included: N1234: "airport in sight" controller: "cleared visual approach" N1234: "roger, we'll cancel IFR" This happens daily, why? What is the point in reporting the airport and a) not requesting the visual, if it's wanted, or, b) canceling in the first transmission if the visual isn't wanted? Someone brought up wasted transmissions, there's an example. Speaking of wasted transmissions, and someone used the example of five transmissions to get the Visual approach sequence rolling, the controller who will be issuing the approach should on initial call-in advise of what to expect. This should make it clearer and what's expected of the pilot later. Example: "N1234, expect visual runway 25, advise when you have atis Xray and the airport in sight" (technically now I guess we have to say the name of the airport and it's position - is it done? not often) Anyway, that transmission sure shouldn't leave much doubt in anyone's mind. It's also a good time if the pilot is requesting something other than that. Cruise Clearances: the reason it's not used much and rarely offered, here anyway, is terrain and radio/radar coverage. It's basically a block altitude from whatever you give away, to the ground, and if it doesn't work out, back up to whatever altitude you assign. That's one hell of a chunk of airspace to lock up. And you are never sure how long you are really giving it away for as you may not hear the aircraft cancel. Also things not used often or on a regular basis, controllers get rusty on, let's be honest. Contact Approaches: Read last sentence, just not requested enough and pilots and controllers both get rusty on it. Example: had a guy ask for one at an airport with no SIAP, another one asked for one where the tower said they were totally IFR less than a mile visibility, virtually impossible to accomplish. On the controller side, you'll see the "standby" as they ask their supervisor if/how to do it. Some observations, Chris |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |
Night over water | Stuart King | Instrument Flight Rules | 43 | March 4th 04 01:13 AM |
Completing the Non-precision approach as a Visual Approach | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 45 | November 20th 03 05:20 AM |
Visual Appr. | Stuart King | Instrument Flight Rules | 15 | September 17th 03 08:36 PM |