![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Theune wrote:
blanche cohen wrote: There's a TFR today over DC for the State of the Union address. I don't understand why when there's been a massive one in place for the past 4 years. While I don't agree in the need for the ADIZ, I think in this case it's more justified then normal. The entire leadership of our country ( Both sides )is in one building for the sotu and it's a good idea to ratchet up security for that event. It's only 4 hours and if it were not for the ADIZ I don't think anyone would complain about it. While the risk of a light plane actually doing any damage is small, let's face it, you could load 500 pounds or so of high explosive into a 172 and that would make a fairly big hole in the capital building. I think that preventing that kind of attack should start way before the plane gets in the air, but for a short amount of time closing the airspace does make sense. The security on commercial aircraft now makes the possibility of another 911 attack remote but that level of screening and airmarshalls just does not exist for GA. Let's not over react to reasonable measures just because they are over shadowed by un reasonable ones. Sure, a light plane might poke a hole in a builing. Maybe. But as fuzzy as my memory is, I remember a couple heavy airliners doing a lot more damage a few years ago. Yet no one is calling for airline traffic to be disrupted into the area. Why? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|