![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Lamb wrote:
Jerry Springer wrote: Richard Lamb wrote: Jerry Springer wrote: A good share of these stories are about factory built certified aircraft. Most kitbuilt aircraft now days are very safe. Jerry Only if they don't fly, Jerry... And there are a lot of homebuilts that hardly ever leave the ground. Richard Not sure what you mean they are safe only if they do not fly? Are you speaking of all aircraft in general or are you speaking only of experimental aircraft? If you read the "2004 Nall" report you will find that homebuilt aircraft have about the same rate of accidents as factory built aircraft do. Ron W posted some statistic that relate to first flight accidents, most of which are caused by fuel problems. This risk can be eliminated by proper fuel flow testing before the first flight IMO. To the Cessna 172 driver that asked for proof that homebuilt aircraft were safe please post you information saying they are not as safe as any other aircraft flying. I find that is mostly the uniformed that that have a preconceived notion that an aircraft built at home must not be as safe as factory built aircraft. Most homebuilders are very particulier and realize that it is their butts and their families and friends that will be flying in these creations. Jerry(flying my RV-6 over 16 years)Springer Easy Jerry, Didn't mean to offend (or frighten) anyone. Yes, among the RV gang, most of them DO fly - some a lot. But there are others who simply don't. And there are a significant fraction that almost NEVER fly. Now, according to Ron's statistics... Factory test flights don't seem to have the same kind of numbers. But, of course, YMMV... Richard Richard, I did not take offense nor was I frightened. :-) Having attended FIRC every two years for 30 years I see the numbers and they are not much different than those of factory built aircraft. I was trying to figure out if you thought homebuilts were more dangerous than any other type of aircraft? I got the impression that the original poster was glad that he had not bought a kitbuilt airplane because they were more dangerous. Anyone that is interested in some interesting statistics can dnload the Nall report from the AOPA web site: http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/ All of us that fly I believe understand that there is a certain amount of risk involved. Jerry |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
1 Fatal ...r.a.h or r.a.p? | Montblack | Piloting | 38 | February 9th 06 02:00 PM |
Fatal Injury: hit by the prop | [email protected] | Piloting | 43 | January 27th 05 04:26 PM |
Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident | Aardvark | Piloting | 44 | May 21st 04 02:34 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |