![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Evans wrote:
Here's the current FAA guidance on the subject: (HBAW 02-01B) http://www.faa.gov/library/manuals/e...ors/8300/hbaw/ 2002/ An excerpt below, but please read the whole bulletin in the link above as this policy should not be taken out of context. Most IA's will not sign off an annual on an aircraft with an out-of-date hydro. 'C. Title 49 CFR parts 171 through 180, Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), pertains to the retest and inspection of cylinders in transportation in commerce. However, cylinders used as components in aircraft are not considered to be in transportation in commerce when installed in an aircraft. As a result, the retest period for cylinders used as a component of and installed in an aircraft is not subject to the HMR. However, 49 CFR part 180, =A7 180.205, formerly part 173, =A7 173.34(e), would apply to a cylinder that is removed from the aircraft and offered for transportation as an article of commerce. In this case, the cylinder must include the appropriate exterior packaging and hazard communication requirements (i.e., shipping papers, marking, and labeling).' Jim Two observations. 1) This bulletin appears to apply only to type certified aircraft. 2) Section 1,3,C,3 shown below only requires that non-DOT cylinders must be tested as per DOT specifications. 'All other cylinders must be inspected and tested as required by subparagraph 3C(1) above as it applies to DOT 3HT cylinders unless alternative testing and inspection procedures are specified by the manufacturer or referenced authority'. The bulletin also states that that existing dot requirements do not apply to aircraft 02 cylinders which makes me wonder if DOT requirements are only for the transportation of cylinders. Can anyone come up with the actual DOT regulation that a non-DOT aircraft 02 cylinder cannot be legally filled? I'm under the impression that the cylinders we use in our gliders are NOT classified as aircraft components, but are, instead, considered "portable" equipment. To be aircraft components, the glider would have to be certified with an oxygen system, and none of them are. What we do is (I believe) no different than the airplane pilot that carries on a cloth bag with the cylinder and regulator in it, then uses the seat belt to strap it down next to him. In other words, our gliders do not have oxygen systems in them, just carry-on baggage that happens to be an oxygen system. If true, then the cylinders have to meet the regulations for carrying these cylinders around in cars, busses, etc, which would be DOT regulations. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA www.motorglider.org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad cylinder | Denny | Owning | 17 | September 12th 05 06:04 PM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Piloting | 47 | July 4th 05 10:53 PM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Aerobatics | 20 | June 29th 05 09:35 AM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Home Built | 22 | June 29th 05 09:35 AM |
Start Anywhere Cylinder (SSA rules proposal) | Mark Navarre | Soaring | 15 | September 25th 03 01:13 PM |