![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc Ramsey wrote:
I also suspect that FLARM won't do much to help where I'm most concerned about a collision with another glider, the ridge running down the White and Inyo mountains near the CA/NV border. FLARM advertises an effective range of 2-3 km, or 1 to 1.5 nm. Given a head-on approach between two gliders, each running at a TAS of 150 knots, you'll be lucky to get 10 seconds of warning. Might work for an ex-fighter pilot, but that's not much time for someone like me... But in the case of running the Whites, there's a radio procedure in place. http://www.soaringsafety.org/present...2Nose_2002.ppt Any idea how universally adopted (or not) it is? Jeremy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dumb Reg question | John Gaquin | Piloting | 67 | May 4th 05 04:54 AM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
Real World Specs for FS 2004 | Paul H. | Simulators | 16 | August 18th 03 09:25 AM |