![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote:
:On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 03:08:52 GMT, Fred J. McCall wrote: : :Ed Rasimus wrote: : ::The USN has a tendency to be a bit parochial about who is defending ::them! : :Primarily because we're afraid that the Air Farce might do the same :stellar job when they take over that job that they did for so many :years in providing close air support for the Army. :-) : :Even with the smiley face at the end, that is patently absurd. I could :introduce you to a lot of AF airplane drivers both current and dating :back to SEA that spent a lot of time putting ordnance "in the wires" :and working both at night and under the weather in support of guys on :the ground. There is no more important mission. And I could introduce you to a lot of grunts on the ground that thought parts of the Air Force were being taught that CAS was something you did from 30,000 feet and would rather have the Marines, the Navy, or the Australians up there. :I have a foil I want to use at a meeting, but I need to make sure no :USAF personnel are there before I do. It's a shot of a Hornet on :final to trap, with the caption: : : "If it was easy, we'd let the Air Force do it." : :You ought to put up a video clip of Baghdad in the middle of the night :with all of those missile trails and tracers then one of Sadaam's Hq :buildings being excised from amidst the neighborhoods without :collateral damage by an F-117, B-2 or F-15E. The caption can be: : : "If the Navy could reach it, we wouldn't have to do it." Except, of course, that would be preposterous since the Navy could and did 'reach it'. We didn't have 5 carriers over there for sport, sport. :No one ever won a war by "out-landing" the enemy. Uh, that's how you win the air war. If a higher percentage of your take-offs end in landings than the enemy can manage, you get air superiority. :Besides, why would :you want to fight a war from any place without a bar? Well, there is that. [And this might explain that issue that so many grunts had with USAF CAS. :-)] -- "The way of the samurai is found in death. If by setting one's heart right every morning and evening, one is able to live as though his body were already dead, he gains freedom in The Way. His whole life will be without blame, and he will succeed in his calling." -- "Hagakure Kikigaki", Yamamoto Tsunetomo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fleet Air Arm Carriers and Squadrons in the Korean War | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 5th 04 02:58 AM |
"New helicopters join fleet of airborne Border Patrol" | Mike | Rotorcraft | 1 | August 16th 04 09:37 PM |
Carrier strike groups test new Fleet Response Plan | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 18th 04 10:25 PM |
Fleet Air Arm | Tonka Dude | Military Aviation | 0 | November 22nd 03 09:28 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |