![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:39:12 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll"
wrote: "Bela P. Havasreti" wrote in message ... Maybe so, There's no "maybe" about it. The Pilot/Controller Glossary was compiled to promote a common understanding of the terms used in the Air Traffic Control system. The instruction "Go Around" is defined as: "Instructions for a pilot to abandon his/her approach to landing. Additional instructions may follow. Unless otherwise advised by ATC, a VFR aircraft or an aircraft conducting visual approach should overfly the runway while climbing to traffic pattern altitude and enter the traffic pattern via the crosswind leg. A pilot on an IFR flight plan making an instrument approach should execute the published missed approach procedure or proceed as instructed by ATC; e.g., "Go around" (additional instructions if required)." but the pilot in command is the ultimate authority for the safety of the flight.... "The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft." Authority and responsibility go hand-in-hand. So if you're instructed to overfly the runway while climbing to traffic pattern altitude, but instead use your PIC authority and begin a climbing turn to the right and collide with an aircraft on downwind, you're responsible for all damages, injuries, and lives lost. For what it's worth, I'd only side-step if I didn't like what I saw below and in front of me. Letting ATC know what I was doing would of course be a polite thing to do! It would also make any potential enforcement action of your violation of FAR 91.123(b) easier. ATC can issue whatever instructions they want. If a collision is imminent, or likely, based upon their instruction and based upon what I'm seeing out of the windshield as PIC, I'm going to do whatever it takes to keep from colliding with another aircraft. As someone else pointed out, the idea is to be around for the hearing, or the inevitable "talk" one might have with the feds. Pilots are human beings and sometimes make mistakes. Sometimes sheet metal gets bent, and other times, folks get hurt or killed. Controllers are not exempt from "being human" and making mistakes.... (it's happened many times before, and it'll no doubt happen again). Bela P. Havasreti |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|